Post by account_disabled on Feb 28, 2024 5:32:19 GMT -5
Julián Macías Tovar, activist against digital disinformation , has brought to light the information strategy behind the “attack” on the Minister of Consumer Affairs after an interview in 'The Guardian' two weeks ago. As reported by the website cdecomunicacion.es , echoing said interview, the minister told the British newspaper that “Spain exports poor quality meat from abused animals”, a headline later picked up by many media outlets and which has gone viral, causing a cascade of criticism. to the minister and voices calling for his immediate resignation, mainly from the spokespersons for Vox, PP and C's, but also for the PSOE. In a thread published on his Twitter account , Julián Macías describes the campaign against Alberto Garzón as a “planned and coordinated attack” and the original news as an “ad hoc publication” by “a website controlled by the macro-farm lobby, responsible for destroy native livestock.
He affirms, a “made-up news” and a “manipulated headline” for which “payment has been made” and “massive dissemination” has been carried out among the media and political leaders who accuse the minister [
]Malta Phone Number[/] of attacking Spanish ranchers. “There are hundreds of accounts that publish the adhoc contracted article, including almost all the spokespersons for the PP and VOX. They all hide the term macrofarms, which are what the minister was referring to. The website is so residual that no one shared its most read publications,” says the activist on the social network. garzon interviewGarzón himself has had to confront politics by publishing the literal nature of his statements to 'The Guardian' on his Twitter account (right image) . Alberto Garzón : "I take this opportunity to publish the complete transcript of what I said in the interview, because for reasons of space the journalist had to exclude some elements that today, in the heat of the hoax and lies that certain actors promote, are highlighted.
[]
[/]
Criticism was of the macrofarms, not the ranchers: “in more than 100K publications, the term macrofarms does not appear,” says Julián Macías.n any case, it could be challenged before the courts based on the regulations that are about to be approved, because the Noviercas project exceeds 20,What organization is there to carry it out? And here lies a basic theme. A new project cannot be proposed based on a sum or a rehashing of pre-existing projects, all of which are different from each other. But an organization is needed, and an extensive organization that reaches all corners of the country. Obviously, the participation of pre-existing organizations can be counted on, but as long as they share the same bases of the project. A political project can be made like a patchwork suit or on new political and ideological bases and its future will depend on it. Because the organization has two basic objectives if it has sufficient extension, to know the social reality on which it works to develop the political strategy and to be the source of transmission of the project in all the areas in which it acts. That is to say, the organization and not just the leaders must be the “Collective Political Intellectual.” The political moment we are in, which is neither 1978 nor 15M, is the moment for a policy of facts, not of nostalgia or ideal desires.
He affirms, a “made-up news” and a “manipulated headline” for which “payment has been made” and “massive dissemination” has been carried out among the media and political leaders who accuse the minister [
]Malta Phone Number[/] of attacking Spanish ranchers. “There are hundreds of accounts that publish the adhoc contracted article, including almost all the spokespersons for the PP and VOX. They all hide the term macrofarms, which are what the minister was referring to. The website is so residual that no one shared its most read publications,” says the activist on the social network. garzon interviewGarzón himself has had to confront politics by publishing the literal nature of his statements to 'The Guardian' on his Twitter account (right image) . Alberto Garzón : "I take this opportunity to publish the complete transcript of what I said in the interview, because for reasons of space the journalist had to exclude some elements that today, in the heat of the hoax and lies that certain actors promote, are highlighted.[
][/]Criticism was of the macrofarms, not the ranchers: “in more than 100K publications, the term macrofarms does not appear,” says Julián Macías.n any case, it could be challenged before the courts based on the regulations that are about to be approved, because the Noviercas project exceeds 20,What organization is there to carry it out? And here lies a basic theme. A new project cannot be proposed based on a sum or a rehashing of pre-existing projects, all of which are different from each other. But an organization is needed, and an extensive organization that reaches all corners of the country. Obviously, the participation of pre-existing organizations can be counted on, but as long as they share the same bases of the project. A political project can be made like a patchwork suit or on new political and ideological bases and its future will depend on it. Because the organization has two basic objectives if it has sufficient extension, to know the social reality on which it works to develop the political strategy and to be the source of transmission of the project in all the areas in which it acts. That is to say, the organization and not just the leaders must be the “Collective Political Intellectual.” The political moment we are in, which is neither 1978 nor 15M, is the moment for a policy of facts, not of nostalgia or ideal desires.