Post by mistyssaktersfo33 on Dec 19, 2023 3:31:47 GMT -5
Users have the right to know what data companies collect and process about them, including location data. This is independent of the authorities’ right to access such data. There is no substantive exception to the right of access in this case. Data protection lawyers dismissed the complaint without giving reasons. The Spanish office sided with Virgin Telecom after a customer complained that the complaint was filed in March without providing any other reasons. He simply said he followed the company's reasoning that it didn't exist. It is highly problematic if the data protection authority makes a decision without further explanation and without any legal basis to support the request.
Data protection lawyers have already filed an appeal. the decision to ensure users are aware of all data generated and stored about them. Similar case in Austria. An appeal was filed in Austria against a similar case in 2018. The Austrian data protection agency confirmed that a mobile operator was refusing to provide data to its customers based on a highly questionable Email Marketing List interpretation of national law. Today's appeal to the national court hopes to prevent other data protection authorities from making similar decisions that clearly violate fundamental rights. Commodore must enforce the User's rights in accordance with this. RELATED ARTICLE Statement about four-year validity period does not change culture of non-compliance.
[img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shafik-120/office-img/main/Forum/Phone-Number/img15.imageshack.us/img15/9020/lofbbs.png"]/c/2.png[/img][/url]
Effective on the day of the year This is considered a watershed moment. The comments fall somewhere between the EU taking privacy seriously and the internet going down at midnight. The past four years have shown that laws alone cannot change business models that rely on the misuse of personal data and a culture within the privacy industry that often focuses on hiding regulatory breaches. After the initial shock many in the data industry have learned to accept it without actually changing practices. This is mostly done by simply ignoring user permissions and evading it.
Data protection lawyers have already filed an appeal. the decision to ensure users are aware of all data generated and stored about them. Similar case in Austria. An appeal was filed in Austria against a similar case in 2018. The Austrian data protection agency confirmed that a mobile operator was refusing to provide data to its customers based on a highly questionable Email Marketing List interpretation of national law. Today's appeal to the national court hopes to prevent other data protection authorities from making similar decisions that clearly violate fundamental rights. Commodore must enforce the User's rights in accordance with this. RELATED ARTICLE Statement about four-year validity period does not change culture of non-compliance.
[img src="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shafik-120/office-img/main/Forum/Phone-Number/img15.imageshack.us/img15/9020/lofbbs.png"]/c/2.png[/img][/url]
Effective on the day of the year This is considered a watershed moment. The comments fall somewhere between the EU taking privacy seriously and the internet going down at midnight. The past four years have shown that laws alone cannot change business models that rely on the misuse of personal data and a culture within the privacy industry that often focuses on hiding regulatory breaches. After the initial shock many in the data industry have learned to accept it without actually changing practices. This is mostly done by simply ignoring user permissions and evading it.